Far-Left

Very strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with the far-left's desire for increased corporate responsibility and accountability. By holding businesses liable if the primary use of their product is for illegal activity, the far-left would argue that this could help reduce the prevalence of gun violence and promote a safer society. This approach would likely be seen as a more comprehensive solution than simply allowing individual lawsuits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Far-left ideology often supports stricter gun control measures and holding those who profit from firearms accountable. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to discourage the proliferation of guns and promote corporate responsibility. However, the far-left might prefer more systemic changes to gun control laws rather than relying on individual lawsuits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

Allowing victims of gun violence to sue only dealers might be seen as a step in the right direction by the far-left, as it would hold at least one part of the firearms industry accountable. However, the far-left would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach that also includes manufacturers, as outlined in Answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While the far-left might agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable for negligence, they would likely argue that this does not go far enough in addressing the issue of gun violence. The far-left would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to holding the firearms industry accountable, such as the one outlined in Answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

The far-left might see some merit in allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, but the focus on the losing party paying all legal fees and the emphasis on the constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason might not resonate as strongly with the far-left's broader goals of systemic change and corporate accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The far-left generally supports increased gun control and accountability for those involved in the firearms industry. They would likely disagree with the idea that victims of gun violence should not be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as this could be seen as protecting the interests of the gun industry over the well-being of individuals and communities affected by gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.