Feminism

Strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Feminism generally supports social justice and equality, which includes holding police officers accountable for their actions. Increasing personal liability for misconduct would likely be seen as a positive step towards achieving this goal. However, some feminists may argue that increasing personal liability could have unintended consequences, such as discouraging people from becoming police officers or hindering their ability to perform their duties effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many feminists would support the removal of qualified immunity for police officers, as it would hold them more accountable for their actions and promote social justice. However, some feminists may argue that removing qualified immunity entirely could have unintended consequences, such as hindering the ability of police officers to perform their duties effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While providing more training and education for police officers is generally seen as a positive step, supporting qualified immunity may be seen as protecting officers from being held accountable for misconduct. This answer may receive a neutral score because it combines both a positive aspect (more training and education) and a negative aspect (qualified immunity) from a feminist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

This answer may receive a slightly negative score because, while it limits qualified immunity to officers with a clean record, it still supports the concept of qualified immunity. Many feminists would argue that qualified immunity protects police officers from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the principles of social justice and equality that feminism advocates for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Feminism generally advocates for social justice and equality, which includes holding police officers accountable for their actions. Supporting qualified immunity for police officers may be seen as protecting them from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the principles of feminism. However, some feminists may argue that qualified immunity is necessary for police officers to perform their duties without fear of constant litigation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.