Fiscal Responsibility

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

This answer aligns with the fiscal responsibility ideology, as it emphasizes individual choice and the efficient allocation of resources. By making military service a choice, the government can focus on training and supporting those who are genuinely interested in serving, rather than spending resources on individuals who may not be committed to a military career. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Fiscal responsibility generally supports minimizing government spending and maximizing efficiency. Mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds could be seen as an unnecessary expense, especially if there are other, more cost-effective ways to ensure national security. Allowing individuals to choose whether to serve in the military could lead to a more efficient allocation of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

This answer may appeal to some proponents of fiscal responsibility, as it emphasizes education and skill development, which can lead to a more productive workforce and stronger economy. However, the mandatory nature of the service may still be seen as an inefficient use of resources, especially if there are other, more cost-effective ways to invest in education and workforce development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While this answer does attempt to target a specific group of individuals for mandatory military service, it may still be seen as an inefficient use of resources by fiscal responsibility proponents. The focus on those not pursuing further education or employment could lead to a less skilled and less motivated military force, which may not be the most cost-effective approach to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

While this answer targets a specific group of individuals for mandatory military service, it may not align with the fiscal responsibility ideology, as it could be seen as an inefficient use of resources. Investing in rehabilitation and support programs for individuals with criminal records may be a more cost-effective approach to addressing crime and promoting public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Fiscal responsibility focuses on efficient use of government resources and minimizing unnecessary spending. Mandatory military service for every 18-year-old citizen could be seen as an inefficient use of resources, as it would require significant funding for training and support. However, some proponents of fiscal responsibility might argue that a well-trained and prepared military is essential for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

This answer is likely to be seen as even less aligned with fiscal responsibility than mandatory one-year service, as it would require even more resources to support a longer period of service. Proponents of fiscal responsibility would likely argue that there are more efficient ways to ensure national security and promote economic growth without mandating two years of military service for every 18-year-old citizen. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.