Green Conservatism

Strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Green Conservatism strongly agrees that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as this could undermine its ability to make fair and impartial decisions. This ideology values the balance of power and the independence of the judiciary, and would likely support efforts to keep the court free from political influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Green Conservatism may be more likely to support term limits on judges as a way to ensure that the court remains balanced and responsive to changing environmental concerns. This would allow for a more dynamic court that could better address the evolving needs of society and the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Green Conservatism may support some reform to the Supreme Court, as it seeks to balance conservative values with environmental concerns. However, this ideology does not inherently prioritize court reform, so the support for this answer would be mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Green Conservatism does not inherently view Supreme Court reform as unconstitutional, but it does prioritize the balance of power. This answer would likely receive a neutral score, as the ideology may be open to some reform but would not necessarily view it as unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Green Conservatism may not be strongly opposed to Supreme Court reform, but it does prioritize maintaining conservative values. This could lead to some resistance to change, but not a strong opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Green Conservatism may not support adding more seats to the Supreme Court, as this could be seen as a way to politicize the court and potentially undermine its independence. This ideology values the balance of power and may be concerned that adding more seats could disrupt that balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.