Green Politics

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Green Politics would agree that refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power. They prioritize international cooperation and diplomacy, and maintaining the integrity of NATO is essential for global stability. However, they would also advocate for more focus on non-military solutions and equitable defense spending among NATO countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Green Politics generally prioritize diplomacy and international cooperation over military action. While they may not be enthusiastic about military spending, they would likely support defending NATO allies to maintain global stability and peace. However, they would also advocate for more focus on diplomacy and non-military solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While Green Politics may agree with the idea of encouraging NATO countries to contribute more to their defense budgets, they would likely not support refusing to defend allies based on their military spending. This stance could lead to increased global instability and goes against the principles of international cooperation and diplomacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Green Politics emphasizes the importance of international cooperation and diplomacy. Refusing to defend NATO allies would undermine these principles and could lead to increased global instability. However, they may push for more equitable defense spending among NATO countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Withdrawing from NATO would be counterproductive to the Green Politics' goals of international cooperation and diplomacy. NATO has been a significant force for maintaining peace and stability in the post-World War II era, and withdrawing could have negative consequences for global security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.