Humanism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Humanism values progress and reform, and term limits on judges could be seen as a way to ensure that the Supreme Court remains up-to-date with current societal values. This answer would likely receive a higher level of agreement than Answer 1, as it focuses on a specific reform that could be seen as promoting progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Humanism generally supports the idea of progress and reform, so there might be some agreement with this answer. However, humanism does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court, so the agreement would not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Humanism values reason and evidence-based decision-making, so there might be some agreement with the idea that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. However, this answer does not address the possibility of reform, which humanism generally supports, so the agreement would not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

While humanism supports progress and reform, this answer focuses on a specific change that may not necessarily align with humanist values. Including more seats could be seen as a way to increase diversity and representation, but it could also be seen as politicizing the court. The agreement would be weak. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Humanism is generally open to change and reform, so there might be some disagreement with this answer. However, since humanism does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court, the disagreement would not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Humanism generally supports progress and reform, so this answer would likely be seen as opposing those values. Additionally, the claim that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional is debatable, and humanism would likely be open to considering different interpretations of the constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.