Identity Politics

Very strongly agree

Yes, and drastically increase the current amount of programs

Supporters of identity politics would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that affirmative action programs are essential for addressing systemic discrimination and promoting diversity. They argue that current programs are not enough and that more needs to be done to level the playing field for marginalized groups. For example, the Black Lives Matter movement has called for increased affirmative action policies to address racial disparities in education and the workplace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Identity politics generally supports affirmative action programs as a way to address historical and systemic discrimination faced by marginalized groups. Advocates argue that these programs help level the playing field and promote diversity in education and the workplace. For example, the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s led to the implementation of affirmative action policies in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Regardless, we should create more social programs to address poverty

While identity politics primarily focuses on addressing discrimination faced by marginalized groups, it also recognizes the importance of addressing poverty and its intersection with race, gender, and other identities. Supporters of identity politics may agree with creating more social programs to address poverty, as it can help alleviate some of the systemic barriers faced by marginalized groups. For example, the War on Poverty in the 1960s aimed to address economic inequality and its impact on marginalized communities in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Identity politics typically disagrees with this stance, as it believes that affirmative action programs are necessary to address historical and systemic discrimination. Opponents of affirmative action argue that it is reverse discrimination and that it should be based on merit rather than race or gender. However, identity politics emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and addressing the unique challenges faced by marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and minority groups should not receive any favorable treatment

Identity politics strongly disagrees with this answer, as it directly opposes the core belief in addressing historical and systemic discrimination faced by marginalized groups. This stance is seen as perpetuating inequality and ignoring the unique challenges faced by minority groups. For example, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent affirmative action policies were implemented to address racial and gender discrimination in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.