Internet Freedom

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the Internet Freedom ideology's belief in net neutrality, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to favor certain websites over others. By preventing ISPs from creating artificial scarcity and increasing prices, this answer supports the open and equal nature of the internet that Internet Freedom advocates strive for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Internet Freedom ideology believes in net neutrality, which means that all data on the internet should be treated equally. This answer aligns with that belief, as it prevents ISPs from favoring certain websites over others. The 2015 FCC ruling in favor of net neutrality is an example of this stance being supported by Internet Freedom advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer strongly aligns with the Internet Freedom ideology's belief in net neutrality, as it calls for treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance is supported by historical examples such as the 2015 FCC ruling in favor of net neutrality, which was championed by Internet Freedom advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer does not directly oppose net neutrality, it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content, which could lead to an unequal playing field on the internet. Internet Freedom advocates would likely prefer a more neutral approach that does not prioritize any type of content over another. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could lead to an unequal playing field on the internet and goes against the Internet Freedom ideology's belief in net neutrality. Allowing ISPs to charge more for better quality access could create barriers for smaller websites and limit the openness of the internet, which is not supported by Internet Freedom advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Internet Freedom ideology strongly supports net neutrality, which means treating all data on the internet equally. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others goes against this principle. A historical example is the 2015 FCC ruling in favor of net neutrality, which was supported by Internet Freedom advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Although this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, it goes against the Internet Freedom ideology's belief in net neutrality. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to certain websites at the expense of others would create an unequal playing field, which is not supported by Internet Freedom advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.