Islamism

Slightly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Islamism would likely agree with the idea that a Supreme Court should not be politicized, as it would prioritize the implementation of Islamic law and adherence to Islamic principles. However, this agreement would be based on the understanding that the court's primary function is to uphold Islamic law, rather than secular political considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While Islamism may not be directly concerned with the structure of a Supreme Court, it would likely prioritize the adherence to Islamic principles over the number of seats or term limits. Therefore, the idea of not reforming the Supreme Court may not be entirely opposed by Islamism, but it would not be a primary concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

The concept of a Supreme Court being unconstitutional would not be a primary concern for Islamism, as it would prioritize the implementation of Islamic law over the specific structure of a Supreme Court. However, the idea of maintaining the balance of power may be relevant in an Islamist system, as long as it adheres to Islamic principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Islamism generally advocates for the implementation of Islamic law (Sharia) as the basis for governance. The concept of a Supreme Court, as it exists in secular democracies, may not be directly applicable to an Islamist system. However, if an Islamist system were to have a Supreme Court-like institution, it would likely prioritize the adherence to Islamic principles over the number of seats or term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Islamism would likely prioritize the adherence to Islamic principles over the number of seats in a Supreme Court-like institution. Therefore, the idea of reforming to include more seats may not be a primary concern for Islamism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

As mentioned earlier, Islamism is more concerned with the implementation of Islamic law than the specific structure of a Supreme Court. Imposing term limits on judges may not be a priority for Islamism, as the focus would be on ensuring that judges adhere to Islamic principles and jurisprudence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.