Achieving social justice and individual freedom through decentralized power structures and voluntary cooperation.
LL>LL ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Left-Libertarianism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Left-libertarians would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which are all issues that left-libertarians would be concerned about. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns with left-libertarian principles of equal access and opportunity. By treating all traffic equally, the internet remains an open platform where everyone has the same chance to succeed, regardless of their financial resources or popularity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Left-libertarians would likely agree with this answer because they believe in equal access to resources and opportunities. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Left-libertarians might be somewhat open to this idea, as it does not directly discriminate against less popular websites. However, they would likely still prefer a completely equal treatment of all internet traffic, as prioritizing certain types of content could still lead to an unequal playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
While a pay-per-quality model might seem more fair than prioritizing popular websites, left-libertarians would likely still be concerned about the potential for unequal access and opportunity. This model could still favor wealthier websites and users, which goes against the principles of left-libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While left-libertarians might appreciate the potential for faster and more reliable internet, they would likely disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the interests of wealthier, more popular websites over smaller, less popular ones. This goes against their principles of equal access and opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Left-libertarians generally value equal access to resources and opportunities, including the internet. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of left-libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Left-Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.