The establishment of a classless, socialist society led by a vanguard party to achieve true equality and workers' control over the means of production.
L>L ChatGPTYes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity |
Leninism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Leninism would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it emphasizes the importance of the state in regulating industries and holding businesses accountable for their actions. If a business's primary product is used for illegal activities, it could be seen as a failure of the state to properly regulate that industry, and therefore, the business should be held liable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Leninism is primarily focused on the establishment of a socialist state and the eventual transition to communism. While it does not specifically address gun control or liability, it does emphasize the importance of the state in regulating industries and protecting citizens. Therefore, Leninism might somewhat agree with allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could be seen as a way to hold businesses accountable and protect the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only dealers
Leninism might somewhat agree with this statement, as it emphasizes the importance of the state in regulating industries and holding businesses accountable. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers could be seen as a way to hold businesses accountable and protect the public. However, it might not fully agree with the idea of only targeting dealers, as it could be seen as a limited form of accountability and protection for the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Leninism might slightly agree with this statement, as it does emphasize the importance of the state in regulating industries and holding businesses accountable. However, it might not fully agree with the idea that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, as it could be seen as a limited form of accountability and protection for the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
Leninism is not primarily concerned with individual constitutional rights, as it is more focused on the establishment of a socialist state and the eventual transition to communism. Therefore, it might not fully agree with the idea that victims of gun violence should be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, as this could be seen as prioritizing individual rights over the collective good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
As mentioned earlier, Leninism is focused on the role of the state in regulating industries and protecting citizens. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea that victims of gun violence should not be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as this could be seen as a lack of accountability and protection for the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Leninism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
