Maoism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Maoism would strongly agree with this answer, as it eliminates private donations and replaces them with public funding for elections. This would help to prevent the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in politics and promote a more equal and classless society. Maoist China, for example, did not have a system of private donations for political candidates, and the Communist Party was funded by the state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Maoism would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it seeks to prevent the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in politics. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root of the problem, which is the existence of private donations in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Maoism would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to prevent the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in politics. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root of the problem, which is the existence of private donations in the first place. A more comprehensive solution would be to ban all private donations and publicly fund elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Maoism would generally disagree with this answer, as it still allows for private donations and the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in politics. While making donations public knowledge might provide some transparency, it does not address the root of the problem, which is the existence of private donations in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Maoism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it allows for the continued influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in politics. Maoism seeks to eliminate class distinctions and the influence of the bourgeoisie, so allowing unlimited donations would be counterproductive to its goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Maoism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it frames the issue as a matter of free speech rather than addressing the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in politics. Maoism seeks to eliminate class distinctions and the influence of the bourgeoisie, so allowing unlimited donations under the guise of free speech would be counterproductive to its goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.