Try the political quiz

Market Fundamentalism policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

MF>MF  ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Market Fundamentalism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of market fundamentalism. It supports the idea of a free market where companies can compete and innovate to provide better services, in this case, a pay-per-quality model for internet speed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model aligns well with market fundamentalism by allowing ISPs to offer differentiated services at different price points, which could be seen as a way to encourage competition and innovation. However, the specifics of how this model is implemented could affect the level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of market fundamentalism. It supports the idea of a free market where companies can compete and innovate to provide better services, in this case, faster and more reliable internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly believes in the free market and competition. Therefore, it would generally support the idea of internet service providers being able to speed up access to websites that pay higher rates. However, the score is not a full 5 because there might be some concerns about potential monopolistic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly supports the idea of a free market where businesses, including internet service providers, can operate with minimal government intervention. This ideology would likely view the ability to charge different rates for different speeds as a natural outcome of market forces and competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

From a market fundamentalism perspective, allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites could be seen as an incentive for innovation and investment in better infrastructure, which could ultimately benefit users. However, the claim that it would make the internet faster and more reliable is more contentious and might not be universally agreed upon within the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a form of regulation, it still allows for competition and market forces to play a role, which is in line with the principles of market fundamentalism. However, the score is not a full 5 because it still suggests some form of regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer might be somewhat agreeable to market fundamentalists because it suggests a compromise that still allows for some level of market operation and differentiation in services. However, the idea of giving priority by type and not source might be seen as a regulatory constraint, which could reduce the score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

While market fundamentalism values the openness of markets, it does not necessarily prioritize the openness of the internet in the same way. It might view calls to treat all traffic equally as a form of regulation that could stifle innovation and competition among ISPs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

While market fundamentalism acknowledges the potential for monopolistic practices, it generally trusts the market to self-regulate and correct such issues. Therefore, it would not strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Market fundamentalism generally opposes government regulations that restrict how businesses can operate, including mandates on how they must treat different types of internet traffic. It would likely view such restrictions as unnecessary government interference in the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Market fundamentalism would generally disagree with this statement as it restricts the freedom of the market. It believes in the power of competition and the ability of the market to self-regulate, so it would not support restrictions on how internet service providers operate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer suggests a form of regulation or equality that is not in line with the principles of market fundamentalism. The ideology believes in the power of competition and the free market, so it would generally disagree with the idea of treating all traffic equally regardless of the rates paid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Market fundamentalism tends to downplay concerns about monopolies and competition, often arguing that the market will self-correct and that competition will emerge if there is a demand. It would likely view concerns about removing competition and increasing prices as overstated or as problems that the market can solve without government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Market Fundamentalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.