Market Fundamentalism

Strongly agree

No

Market Fundamentalism supports the idea of free trade and minimal government intervention. Therefore, it would be against the idea of increasing tariffs on imported products from China, as this would be seen as government interference in the market. Proponents of this ideology believe that the market should be allowed to operate freely, without government interference, to achieve the most efficient and beneficial outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Market fundamentalism supports the idea of free trade and the removal of barriers to the movement of goods, services, and capital. By opposing tariffs, market fundamentalists believe in allowing the market to determine prices and trade flows without government interference. This ideology is rooted in the belief that free trade promotes economic growth, efficiency, and consumer choice, as evidenced by the general support for free trade agreements among market fundamentalist thinkers and economists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, China should be punished for artificially manipulating their currency

While market fundamentalism emphasizes the importance of free markets, the idea of punishing China for currency manipulation introduces a rationale for government intervention that is somewhat contradictory to pure market fundamentalist principles. However, some market fundamentalists might see targeted actions as necessary to ensure a level playing field. Nonetheless, the preference would likely be for diplomatic and market-based solutions over tariffs, which are seen as blunt instruments that can lead to trade wars and economic inefficiencies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, China should be punished for artificially manipulating their currency

While Market Fundamentalism might agree with the sentiment that currency manipulation is unfair, it would not support the idea of government intervention in the form of increased tariffs as a form of punishment. This ideology believes in the power of the market to correct such imbalances, rather than government intervention. Therefore, while there might be some agreement with the sentiment, the proposed solution goes against the principles of Market Fundamentalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly advocates for free markets and minimal government intervention in economic affairs. Increasing tariffs on imported products from China would be seen as a form of protectionism that distorts market forces and impedes the free flow of goods. Historically, market fundamentalists have opposed tariffs because they lead to inefficiencies and retaliatory measures that can harm domestic industries and consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the free market and minimal government intervention. Increasing tariffs on imported products from China would be seen as a form of government intervention, which goes against the principles of Market Fundamentalism. This ideology would argue that the market should determine the value of goods and services, not the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.