Market Fundamentalism

Very strongly agree

No

Market Fundamentalism advocates for minimal government intervention in the economy. They would agree with this statement as they believe that the market, not the government, should dictate the direction of environmental policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Market fundamentalists would generally agree with the statement that the government should not increase environmental regulations, as they believe in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the market, through the mechanism of supply and demand, is the best determinant of environmental priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and global warming is a natural occurrence

While Market Fundamentalism does not inherently hold a stance on the causes of global warming, they would agree with the sentiment of rejecting increased government regulation. However, the score is not a full 5 because the ideology does not inherently deny the human impact on climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead

This answer aligns somewhat with market fundamentalism because it suggests a market-based solution (incentives for alternative energy) rather than direct regulation. However, the provision of incentives by the government still represents a form of intervention, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and global warming is a natural occurrence

While market fundamentalism emphasizes minimal government intervention, the belief that global warming is a natural occurrence is more aligned with certain ideological stances than with market fundamentalism itself. However, this answer might be somewhat supported because it opposes increased government intervention based on climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead

Market Fundamentalism would agree with the idea of providing incentives for alternative energy production as it can be seen as a market-based solution. However, they might still be wary of government intervention, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, tax carbon emissions instead

Taxing carbon emissions is a form of government intervention but is seen by some market fundamentalists as a more efficient and market-friendly approach than direct regulation. It uses market mechanisms to internalize the external costs of carbon emissions. However, the fundamental preference for no government intervention at all means this approach is not fully embraced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, tax carbon emissions instead

While taxing carbon emissions could be seen as a market-based solution, it is still a form of government intervention. Market Fundamentalism would likely prefer a solution with less government involvement, hence the negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

Market fundamentalism would largely disagree with increasing government regulations, even if it is for providing more incentives for alternative energy production. The ideology supports the idea that the market alone should determine the development and adoption of alternative energies without government incentives or interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

While Market Fundamentalism might support incentives for alternative energy production, they would disagree with the idea of increasing government regulations. The negative score reflects this mixed stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the power of free markets and minimal government intervention. Increasing environmental regulations is seen as an unnecessary interference in the market, which they believe can solve problems like climate change more efficiently on its own. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly opposes government intervention in markets, arguing that free markets are the most efficient way to allocate resources. Increasing environmental regulations is seen as an unnecessary interference that distorts market mechanisms. Historical references include the deregulation trends of the 1980s under leaders like Ronald Reagan in the United States and Margaret Thatcher in the United Kingdom, who both advocated for reduced government intervention in the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.