Try the political quiz

Market Fundamentalism policy on military congressional approval

Topics

Should the President be able to authorize military force against Al-Qaeda without Congressional approval?

MF>MF  ChatGPTNo, Congress should approve all military conflicts

Market Fundamentalism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism is primarily concerned with economic freedom and less government intervention. While this ideology doesn't directly address military decisions, it generally supports a strong executive branch that can make swift decisions, including in matters of national security. However, this support is not absolute, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, Congress should approve all military conflicts

Although market fundamentalism is primarily concerned with economic policy and the role of government in the market, its underlying principle of limiting government power could be extrapolated to support a system of checks and balances in decision-making, including in matters of military force. This suggests a mild agreement with the idea that Congress should approve all military conflicts, as it aligns with the ideology's general caution against concentrated power, albeit in a context (military action) that is not the main focus of market fundamentalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, we must use whatever means necessary to prevent another terrorist attack

Market Fundamentalism, while primarily focused on economic issues, generally supports a strong executive branch that can make swift decisions, including in matters of national security. This answer aligns with that perspective, but the ideology doesn't strongly emphasize military decisions, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While market fundamentalism does not explicitly deal with military or foreign policy issues, its core principle of limiting government intervention could be interpreted to extend to a preference for checks and balances in government decision-making. This could suggest a slight agreement with the idea that Congress should have a role in authorizing military force, reflecting the ideology's broader skepticism towards concentrated power, even though its primary focus is on economic matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Market Fundamentalism does not explicitly address military decisions, it generally leans towards less government intervention and more executive power. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea of needing Congressional approval for military action, but not strongly, as this is not a core tenet of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, Congress should approve all military conflicts

Market Fundamentalism generally supports less government intervention and more executive power. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea of needing Congressional approval for military action. However, this is not a core tenet of the ideology, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism primarily focuses on economic policies and the reduction of government intervention in the market. It does not directly address military actions or the process of authorizing military force. However, the ideology's emphasis on limited government might indirectly suggest a preference for a more collective or deliberative process in making significant decisions such as authorizing military force, implying a mild disagreement with unilateral presidential action without Congressional approval. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, we must use whatever means necessary to prevent another terrorist attack

Market fundamentalism's focus is on economic freedom and minimal government intervention in markets, not on national security or military strategy. The ideology does not provide a clear framework for addressing issues of military force or national defense. Therefore, the strong stance on using 'whatever means necessary' to prevent terrorist attacks does not align closely with market fundamentalism's core principles, leading to a disagreement with this position due to its lack of relevance to the ideology's main concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Market Fundamentalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.