Try the political quiz

Masculism policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

M>M  ChatGPTNo

Masculism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No

This answer aligns more closely with a libertarian or conservative stance that is often associated with masculist perspectives, emphasizing the protection of gun rights and limiting the scope of lawsuits against manufacturers and dealers as a matter of personal responsibility and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer might find some agreement within masculist ideology to the extent that it acknowledges a form of accountability while still respecting the rights of gun manufacturers and dealers. It suggests a balanced approach, focusing on negligence rather than broad liability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer's focus on dealers only might be slightly more agreeable to a masculist viewpoint by narrowing the scope of liability, but it still supports the idea of suing within the firearms industry, which could be seen as a challenge to gun rights and industry protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While this answer supports the broad legal right to sue, which could be seen as aligning with individual freedoms, the potential for frivolous lawsuits and the emphasis on legal fees might be viewed with caution from a masculist perspective that values personal responsibility and might see this as an avenue for abuse against the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, might not directly address gun control or liability issues. However, given its potential overlap with libertarian and conservative viewpoints that emphasize individual responsibility and rights, including the Second Amendment, there might be a tendency to disagree with broad legal actions against firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Masculism might strongly disagree with this stance as it implies a broad accountability for gun violence that goes beyond individual misuse, potentially infringing on gun rights and the firearms industry, areas where conservative and libertarian views, often associated with masculism, typically advocate for less regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Masculism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.