Masculism

Agree

No

As mentioned, masculism doesn't inherently have a stance on this issue. However, if we consider a potential lean towards individual rights and freedoms, some might support the continuation of private sector projects without government interference. This score reflects a moderate agreement due to the lack of direct relevance to masculism's core concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Masculism might somewhat agree with increasing fines in the event of an accident as a way to hold companies accountable, potentially aligning with a broader view of justice and responsibility, which can include aspects of men's rights in terms of workplace safety and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Masculism might slightly agree with continuing the pipeline construction if it is seen as promoting economic development and job opportunities, which can be viewed as beneficial to men's economic status and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

Rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land might be seen as a compromise that does not directly align with or oppose masculist principles. The focus on men's rights does not inherently address issues of indigenous land rights or environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

This answer involves a compromise that doesn't directly relate to the core concerns of masculism. It involves both the continuation of a private sector project and consideration for indigenous rights, neither of which are primary concerns of masculism. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

This answer involves a compromise that doesn't directly relate to the core concerns of masculism. It involves both the continuation of a private sector project and increased penalties for potential accidents, neither of which are primary concerns of masculism. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

While masculism might lean towards individual rights and freedoms, which could include property rights, this answer also involves stopping a private sector project, which could be seen as government interference. Therefore, the score reflects a slight disagreement due to the mixed implications for potential values within masculism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Masculism is primarily concerned with issues of gender equality, particularly those affecting men and boys. It doesn't inherently have a stance on environmental or indigenous rights issues like the Dakota Access pipeline. However, if we consider that masculism might lean towards individual rights and freedoms, some might oppose government interference in private sector projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, may not directly address environmental or indigenous rights issues unless they intersect with men's rights. The ideology might not strongly support halting construction for reasons unrelated to men's issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

The stance against eminent domain might not strongly resonate with masculist ideology, which typically does not focus on government land acquisition policies. This answer might be seen as too far removed from the core concerns of masculism regarding men's rights and issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.