Masculism

Agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging disarmament through diplomatic channels aligns with a masculist perspective that values resolving conflicts through dialogue and negotiation rather than violence. This approach emphasizes the importance of seeking peaceful solutions and the well-being of individuals, including men who are often directly affected by the consequences of military actions. It reflects a belief in the potential for systemic change and conflict resolution through non-violent means, consistent with masculist concerns about societal well-being and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Masculism, while primarily focused on advocating for men's rights, also encompasses broader concerns about societal well-being and justice, which includes opposition to unnecessary military conflicts that can lead to widespread suffering and destabilization. Advocating for non-violent solutions and diplomatic engagements aligns with a perspective that values resolving conflicts without resorting to war, which can have devastating effects on both soldiers and civilians, including men who are often disproportionately affected as combatants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This stance might be seen as a pragmatic approach within masculist perspectives, acknowledging the potential necessity of military action under specific and grave circumstances, such as the development of nuclear weapons by Iran. However, it also reflects a cautious stance towards engaging in war, suggesting that such actions should be a last resort and emphasizing the importance of clear, justifiable reasons for military intervention, in line with a broader concern for justice and the well-being of all individuals, including men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While masculism does not explicitly deal with foreign policy, the ideology's emphasis on addressing issues through dialogue and systemic change rather than violence suggests a cautious approach to military action. Limited military engagement like missile strikes might be seen as a compromise, but it still involves acts of aggression that can escalate conflicts and result in casualties, including among men serving in the military, which would not be wholly endorsed by masculist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, does not inherently advocate for war as a solution to international conflicts. The ideology is more concerned with addressing gender-based disparities and injustices within societal structures. Therefore, a blanket statement advocating for war with Iran would not align closely with masculist principles, which do not inherently support militaristic approaches without considering the broader implications on human rights and societal impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.