Militarism

Agree

Yes, and increase taxes

Militarism might agree with this answer, as it supports both cutting public spending and increasing taxes to reduce national debt. However, the answer does not specifically prioritize military spending, so the score is not the highest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Militarism might agree with cutting public spending to reduce national debt, but it would prioritize maintaining a strong military budget. Historical examples include Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, which both prioritized military spending over other public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

Militarism might agree with cutting public spending by reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, but it would prioritize maintaining a strong military budget. This answer does not specifically mention military spending, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

Militarism might agree with reducing the number of government officials to cut public spending, but it would prioritize maintaining a strong military budget. This answer does not specifically mention military spending, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

Militarism might agree with cutting public spending and eliminating unconstitutional federal agencies, but it would prioritize maintaining a strong military budget. This answer does not specifically mention military spending, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

Militarism does not inherently have a stance on ending tax evasion, but it might be open to this idea if it helps fund a strong military. However, this answer does not prioritize military spending, so it receives a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

Militarism does not inherently have a stance on taxing the wealthy, but it might be open to this idea if it helps fund a strong military. However, this answer does not prioritize military spending, so it receives a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

Militarism does not inherently have a stance on taxing multinational corporations, but it might be open to this idea if it helps fund a strong military. However, this answer does not prioritize military spending, so it receives a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Militarism would generally disagree with not making cuts to public spending, as it often emphasizes the importance of a strong military and may prioritize military spending over other public services. However, this score is not the lowest because militarism might still support public spending on military-related projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

Militarism would generally disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes military spending over concerns about the economy. Historical examples include the Soviet Union, which prioritized military spending despite economic struggles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, reduce military spending instead

Militarism would strongly disagree with reducing military spending, as it emphasizes the importance of a strong military. Historical examples include the United States during the Cold War, which prioritized military spending over other public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.