Modern Liberalism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with modern liberalism's support for net neutrality and concerns about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. The 2015 FCC net neutrality rules were implemented to prevent ISPs from engaging in practices that could harm competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer strongly aligns with modern liberalism's support for net neutrality and the principle of treating all internet traffic equally. The 2015 FCC net neutrality rules are an example of modern liberalism's commitment to maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Modern liberalism supports net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, this answer aligns with the principles of modern liberalism. The 2015 FCC net neutrality rules are an example of this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer does not completely go against the principles of modern liberalism, it still allows for some prioritization of internet traffic. Modern liberalism generally supports net neutrality and equal access for all users, which would mean not prioritizing any type of traffic over another. The 2015 FCC net neutrality rules are an example of this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer allows for a pay-per-quality model, which could potentially lead to unequal access to the internet and goes against the principles of modern liberalism. Modern liberalism supports net neutrality and equal access for all users, as demonstrated by the 2015 FCC net neutrality rules. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While modern liberalism values a fast and reliable internet, it also prioritizes net neutrality and equal access for all users. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones goes against this principle. The 2015 FCC net neutrality rules are an example of modern liberalism's commitment to equal access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Modern liberalism generally supports net neutrality, which means treating all internet traffic equally. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones goes against this principle. For example, in 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under the Obama administration implemented net neutrality rules to prevent ISPs from engaging in such practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.