Multiracialism

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Multiracialism would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of diversity and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would hinder the ability of smaller, diverse voices to be heard and compete with larger, more established websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all traffic equally aligns with the principles of multiracialism, which emphasizes diversity and equal opportunities. By maintaining the openness of the internet, smaller, diverse voices have a better chance of being heard and competing with larger, more established websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Multiracialism would generally support equal access to the internet, as it promotes diversity and equal opportunities. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain a level playing field for all content creators. However, the score is not the strongest agreement because the ideology does not inherently focus on internet policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer is somewhat neutral from a multiracialism perspective. While prioritizing by type rather than source could be seen as more equitable, it does not directly address the concerns of equal access and opportunities for diverse voices that are central to multiracialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could still create an unequal playing field, as it may favor wealthier content creators who can afford to pay for higher quality access. This could make it harder for smaller, diverse voices to be heard, which goes against the principles of multiracialism. However, the disagreement is not strong because the answer does attempt to address some concerns about equal access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access could be seen as a positive, multiracialism would likely prioritize equal access and opportunities for diverse voices over speed and reliability. Allowing ISPs to prioritize popular websites could create an unequal playing field, making it harder for smaller, diverse voices to be heard. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Multiracialism emphasizes the importance of diversity and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could create an unequal playing field, making it harder for smaller, diverse voices to be heard. However, this score is not the strongest disagreement because the ideology does not inherently focus on internet policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.