Nationalism

Strongly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Nationalists may agree with this answer because it strikes a balance between holding businesses accountable and protecting Second Amendment rights. By focusing on negligence, this perspective acknowledges that firearms dealers and manufacturers should be held responsible for their actions, but not for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many nationalists prioritize the protection of individual rights, including the Second Amendment. They may argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This perspective aligns with the belief in limited government intervention in private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

This answer is neutral for nationalists because it acknowledges the constitutional right to sue, but it also places a financial burden on the losing party. Some nationalists may see this as a fair compromise, while others may argue that it still infringes on Second Amendment rights or does not go far enough in holding businesses accountable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Some nationalists may agree with this answer because it holds dealers accountable without targeting manufacturers. However, many nationalists would still argue that dealers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products, emphasizing the importance of individual responsibility and Second Amendment rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

While some nationalists may agree that businesses should be held accountable for illegal activities, many would argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This perspective emphasizes the importance of individual responsibility and the protection of Second Amendment rights.

Disagree

Yes

Nationalism often emphasizes individual rights and freedoms, including the right to bear arms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as an infringement on these rights and an attack on the Second Amendment. However, some nationalists may see the need for holding businesses accountable for their products.