Natural Rights

Strongly agree

Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed

This answer aligns with the Natural Rights ideology, as it supports the right to bear arms and also emphasizes the importance of security and protection. Requiring at least one teacher or security guard to be armed could be seen as a practical application of the Natural Rights principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Natural Rights ideology emphasizes the importance of individual rights, including the right to bear arms. Allowing teachers to carry guns at school could be seen as an extension of this right. However, the focus of Natural Rights is more on the individual's rights rather than specific policies like arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, hire professionally trained security guards instead

This answer is neutral from a Natural Rights perspective, as it does not directly address the individual's right to bear arms. Instead, it suggests hiring professionally trained security guards, which could be seen as a compromise between ensuring safety and respecting individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

While the Natural Rights ideology might acknowledge the potential risks of accidental shootings, it would still prioritize the individual's right to bear arms. The disagreement with this answer would not be as strong, as it does not directly oppose the right to bear arms but rather raises a concern about the consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Natural Rights ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it restricts the individual's right to bear arms. However, the disagreement may not be strong, as the focus of Natural Rights is on individual rights rather than specific policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.