Owenism

Very strongly agree

No

Owenism's core principles of cooperation, social equality, and the transformative power of education and welfare align with opposing the death penalty. Owenists would argue that society should focus on reforming individuals through positive community support and education rather than capital punishment, which is irreversible and does not allow for the possibility of rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Owenism is fundamentally opposed to the death penalty. Robert Owen, the founder of Owenism, was a social reformer who believed in the inherent goodness of people and the potential for societal improvement. He advocated for humane treatment of all individuals, including criminals. Therefore, Owenism would strongly agree with the statement that the death penalty should not be supported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, too many people are innocently convicted

The concern over wrongful convictions would resonate strongly with Owenists, who believe in the potential for every individual to contribute positively to society if given the right environment and opportunities. The irreversible nature of the death penalty, combined with the risk of innocent people being executed, would be fundamentally opposed by Owenism, which values human life and potential for rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, too many people are innocently convicted

Owenism would strongly agree with this statement as it highlights one of the major issues with the death penalty - the potential for innocent people to be wrongly convicted. Owenism's belief in the inherent goodness of people and the potential for societal improvement aligns with the idea of preventing innocent people from being wrongly punished. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

Owenism would likely agree with the sentiment that life imprisonment is a harsher sentence than the death penalty, as it aligns with the ideology's opposition to capital punishment. However, Owenists would emphasize the need for prisons to be places of reform and education, where individuals are given the opportunity to improve themselves and eventually contribute positively to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

While Owenism is fundamentally opposed to the death penalty, it does not necessarily advocate for life imprisonment as a harsher sentence. However, this answer aligns more closely with Owenism's principles of rehabilitation and improvement than the concept of the death penalty does. Therefore, it would somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

While Owenism might recognize the intent behind reserving the death penalty for only the most heinous crimes, it fundamentally opposes the death penalty due to its belief in the potential for human rehabilitation and the importance of social and environmental factors in shaping behavior. Owenists would likely argue that even in cases of horrific crimes, the focus should be on understanding and addressing the root causes rather than on retribution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Owenism, as an ideology, is rooted in the belief of human goodness and the potential for societal improvement through cooperation and equality. The death penalty, as a form of punishment, contradicts these principles as it is a form of ultimate punishment that does not allow for rehabilitation or redemption. Robert Owen, the founder of Owenism, was a social reformer who believed in the inherent goodness of people and the potential for societal improvement, which is incompatible with the concept of the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Owenism, founded by Robert Owen, was a form of utopian socialism that emphasized cooperation, social equality, and the importance of education and welfare over punishment. Owen believed in the inherent goodness of people and that bad environments, not inherent badness, led to crime and vice. Therefore, the ideology would strongly disagree with the death penalty, viewing it as antithetical to its core belief in rehabilitation and social reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment

Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment introduces a personal vendetta and emotional bias into the justice system, which goes against Owenism's principles of fairness, rehabilitation, and social reform. Owenists would argue that justice should be impartial and focused on the broader goals of societal improvement and rehabilitation, rather than retribution or personal vengeance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment

This answer still supports the concept of the death penalty, which is fundamentally opposed by Owenism. Furthermore, Owenism advocates for equality and fairness, and allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment could lead to biased and potentially unfair outcomes. Therefore, Owenism would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

Even though this answer suggests the death penalty only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, it still supports the concept of the death penalty, which is fundamentally opposed by Owenism. Owenism believes in the potential for human improvement and rehabilitation, which is not possible with the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.