Protectionism

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Protectionism would agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites. By preventing ISPs from creating artificial scarcity and increasing prices, protectionism aims to protect local businesses and maintain a level playing field for all competitors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

A protectionist ideology would strongly support the idea of treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This approach would help protect smaller, local businesses from being disadvantaged by larger, international competitors and ensure a level playing field for all businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

A protectionist ideology would likely support equal treatment of all websites to ensure that smaller, local businesses are not disadvantaged by larger, international competitors. By preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, protectionism would aim to create a level playing field for all businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer is somewhat neutral from a protectionist perspective. While prioritizing traffic by type could potentially benefit local businesses by ensuring that their content is delivered efficiently, it does not directly address the issue of protecting local businesses from foreign competition. Protectionism would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to ensuring a level playing field for all businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could potentially disadvantage smaller, local businesses that may not be able to afford higher rates for faster access. While this approach might not directly favor foreign competitors, it could still harm the interests of local businesses, which protectionism seeks to protect. Therefore, a protectionist ideology would likely lean towards disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Protectionism generally aims to protect domestic industries and businesses from foreign competition. In the context of internet service providers, this could mean supporting policies that favor local websites. However, allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could harm smaller, local businesses, which protectionism typically seeks to protect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access could be seen as a benefit, protectionism would likely prioritize the interests of local businesses over the potential benefits of faster internet access. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites could disadvantage smaller, local businesses, which protectionism seeks to protect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.