Implementing policies to restrict imports will safeguard domestic industries, promote self-sufficiency, and ultimately strengthen the national economy.
P>P ChatGPTNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Slightly agree
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
While protectionism is mainly concerned with economic policies and trade barriers, this answer might be more appealing to protectionists as it emphasizes clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination without requiring extensive training. This approach could be seen as more efficient and less intrusive, which might resonate with some protectionists. Therefore, the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
As mentioned earlier, protectionism is mainly concerned with economic policies and trade barriers. Racial sensitivity training is not a core issue for protectionists, so their stance on this matter could vary. Thus, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
Protectionism primarily focuses on economic policies and trade barriers. While protectionists may not inherently oppose racial sensitivity training for federal employees, it is not a central issue for this ideology. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade barriers, so racial sensitivity training is not a core issue for this ideology. However, this answer's emphasis on covering all protected groups and avoiding critical race theory might appeal to some protectionists who are concerned about fairness and balance. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
Similar to answer 3, protectionism is more concerned with economic policies and trade barriers than social issues. While protectionists may not inherently oppose racial sensitivity training, including LGBTQ+ topics could be seen as government overreach, which is not a primary concern for protectionists. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
Protectionism is more focused on economic policies and trade barriers than social issues. While protectionists may not inherently oppose racial sensitivity training, extending the requirement to private companies could be seen as government overreach, which is not a primary concern for protectionists. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
