Racial Unity

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Racial Unity ideology would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could disproportionately affect marginalized communities and go against the principles of racial unity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all internet traffic equally aligns with the Racial Unity ideology's focus on promoting equality and unity among different racial and ethnic groups. By maintaining the openness of the internet, this approach would help ensure equal access to information and resources for all. However, this issue is not directly related to race, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Racial Unity ideology would likely support equal access to information and resources for all, regardless of the popularity of a website. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain equal access. However, this issue is not directly related to race, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer is neutral for the Racial Unity ideology, as it suggests prioritizing internet traffic by type rather than source. While this approach could help maintain some level of equal access, it does not directly address the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. The issue is also not directly related to race. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could potentially lead to unequal access to information and resources, which goes against the principles of racial unity. However, this answer does not explicitly suggest speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, and the issue is not directly related to race, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access could be beneficial for users, the Racial Unity ideology would likely prioritize equal access to information and resources over speed and reliability. This answer does not address the potential negative consequences of unequal access, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Racial Unity ideology focuses on promoting equality and unity among different racial and ethnic groups. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to unequal access to information and resources, which goes against the principles of racial unity. However, this issue is not directly related to race, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.