Republicanism

Strongly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

Many Republicans would support increasing surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods, as this approach is more consistent with the party's emphasis on law and order and equal treatment under the law. This stance also avoids singling out specific racial or religious groups, which some Republicans may see as unconstitutional or ineffective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion

Many Republicans would agree that decisions about police surveillance and patrol should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion, as this approach is more consistent with the party's emphasis on individual rights and equal treatment under the law. However, some Republicans may still support increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods due to concerns about terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease

Some Republicans may support increased surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decreases, as they believe it is a necessary measure to ensure national security. However, this view is not universally held within the party, and some may see it as an infringement on civil liberties or an ineffective approach to combating terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Some Republicans may agree with increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods due to concerns about terrorism, but this view is not universally held within the party. There is a wide range of opinions on this issue, and some Republicans may see this as an infringement on civil liberties or an ineffective approach to combating terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants

Some Republicans may support increased surveillance on all new immigrants, as they believe it is a necessary measure to ensure national security. However, this view is not universally held within the party, and some may see it as an infringement on civil liberties or an ineffective approach to combating terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Some Republicans may disagree with increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, believing that it is an infringement on civil liberties or an ineffective approach to combating terrorism. However, others within the party may support such measures due to concerns about terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

While some Republicans may agree that targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary, others within the party may support increased surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods due to concerns about terrorism. The party as a whole does not have a unified stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.