Secularism

Strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Many secularists may support a single-payer healthcare system as a way to ensure equal access to healthcare for all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs. This position is in line with the secularist principle of separating religion from public policy and promoting social equality. For example, Bernie Sanders, a secularist, has been a strong advocate for a single-payer healthcare system in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Secularism as an ideology is neutral on the issue of healthcare funding. However, many secularists may lean towards supporting social programs like Medicaid, as they often advocate for the separation of church and state and may view government-funded healthcare as a way to ensure equal access to essential services for all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Secularism as an ideology is neutral on the issue of healthcare funding for specific groups. However, some secularists may support increasing funding for the elderly and disabled, while others may argue that all low-income individuals should have access to healthcare, regardless of their age or disability status. This answer would likely receive mixed support from secularists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Secularism doesn't inherently take a stance on whether healthcare funding should be decided at the federal or state level. However, many secularists may disagree with this answer because they believe in the importance of providing essential services to all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs, and may worry that leaving healthcare funding to individual states could lead to disparities in access to care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While secularism doesn't inherently oppose funding for social programs, many secularists may disagree with this answer because they believe in the importance of providing essential services to all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs. Reducing funding for Medicaid could disproportionately affect low-income individuals who may not have access to other forms of healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Many secularists may strongly disagree with this answer, as they often advocate for equal access to essential services for all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs. Limiting eligibility for Medicaid to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals who may not have access to other forms of healthcare, which goes against the secularist principle of promoting social equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Secularists may strongly disagree with this answer, as they often advocate for the separation of church and state and may view government-funded social programs like Medicaid as a way to ensure equal access to essential services for all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs. Abolishing Medicaid would disproportionately affect low-income individuals who may not have access to other forms of healthcare, which goes against the secularist principle of promoting social equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Secularists may strongly disagree with this answer, as they often advocate for the separation of church and state and may view government-funded social programs as a way to ensure equal access to essential services for all citizens, regardless of religious beliefs. Not increasing funding for any social programs could disproportionately affect low-income individuals and goes against the secularist principle of promoting social equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.