Sovereigntism

Slightly agree

Yes

Sovereigntism is primarily focused on national sovereignty and self-determination. While it doesn't inherently oppose government funding for mental health research and treatment, it's not a central concern of the ideology. Therefore, the score is slightly positive, as some sovereigntists may support increased funding for mental health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

This answer aligns with sovereigntism's focus on national well-being and self-determination, as it suggests increasing funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. Some sovereigntists may support this approach, as it emphasizes the importance of individualized care and reduces reliance on foreign pharmaceutical companies. However, it's not a central concern of the ideology, so the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

Similar to answer 1, sovereigntism doesn't inherently oppose increased funding for mental healthcare, but it's not a central concern of the ideology. Some sovereigntists may support this answer, as it emphasizes the need for a higher quality of care and services, which could be seen as a matter of national well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Sovereigntism doesn't have a clear stance on whether the government or private companies should address mental health issues. Some sovereigntists may support incentivizing private companies to address this issue, while others may prefer government intervention. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Sovereigntism doesn't inherently oppose government funding for mental health research and treatment, but it also doesn't prioritize it. Some sovereigntists may argue that the government should focus on other issues related to national sovereignty and self-determination. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.