Statism

Strongly agree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Statism would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of a strong central government and its authority over local governments. Banning sanctuary cities would be a clear demonstration of the central government's power and control over immigration policy. The score is not a strong 5 because some proponents of statism might still support sanctuary cities for humanitarian reasons or see the issue as a local matter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Statism would generally agree with this answer, as it supports the idea that the central government should have control over funding and policy decisions. By withholding federal funding from sanctuary cities, the central government can exert its authority and encourage compliance with national immigration policies. However, the score is not a strong 5 because some proponents of statism might still support sanctuary cities for humanitarian reasons or see the issue as a local matter. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Statism emphasizes the importance of a strong central government and its authority over local governments. While some proponents of statism might support sanctuary cities for humanitarian reasons, the general principle of statism would lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it could be seen as undermining the central government's authority on immigration policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.