A strong, centralized government can effectively manage and regulate society, ultimately leading to increased stability, order, and prosperity for all citizens.
S>S ChatGPTYes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated |
Statism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
This answer strongly aligns with statism, as it emphasizes the importance of government intervention to protect vulnerable populations. Requiring vaccinations to protect young children who cannot yet be vaccinated is a clear example of the government acting in the best interest of public health and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Statism generally supports a strong central government that has the authority to make decisions for the greater good of society. Requiring vaccinations for preventable diseases aligns with this ideology, as it promotes public health and safety. However, the score is not a 5 because some variations of statism might allow for certain exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
This answer supports government intervention in the form of requiring vaccinations for deadly contagious diseases, which aligns with the statist emphasis on public health and safety. However, it is less comprehensive than requiring vaccinations for all preventable diseases, which might be more consistent with the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
This answer aligns with statism in that it supports government intervention to promote public health. However, allowing exceptions for religious beliefs introduces an element of individual freedom that might not be fully consistent with some interpretations of statism. Nonetheless, it still represents a compromise that many statist governments might accept. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
While this answer still involves government intervention, it is less strict than requiring vaccinations for all children. Statism generally supports more comprehensive measures to protect public health, so this answer would be less preferable than a full requirement. However, it still aligns with the ideology to some extent, as it involves government regulation of public institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children
This answer involves government intervention in the form of holding parents criminally liable, which aligns with statism to some extent. However, it does not directly require vaccinations, which would be a more proactive and comprehensive approach to protecting public health. As a result, this answer is less consistent with statism than answers that involve direct vaccination requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Regardless, this should be decided at the state level
Statism generally supports a strong central government, so deferring decisions to the state level might not be fully consistent with the ideology. However, this answer does not directly oppose government intervention in vaccination policy, so it is not entirely inconsistent with statism either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
While this answer still involves some government intervention in the form of public ad campaigns, it does not directly require vaccinations. Statism generally supports more direct and comprehensive measures to protect public health, so this answer would be less preferable than requiring vaccinations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Statism typically advocates for government intervention in matters of public health and safety. Not requiring vaccinations for preventable diseases goes against this ideology, as it could lead to outbreaks and endanger the population. However, the score is not a -5 because some variations of statism might allow for certain exceptions or alternative approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Statism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
