Sustainability

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Sustainability ideology would strongly agree with this answer, as it not only supports increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals but also proposes a systemic change towards a single-payer healthcare system. This approach aligns with the goals of social equity, well-being, and efficiency, which are central to sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Sustainability ideology would generally support increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it promotes social equity and well-being. However, this answer does not address the broader systemic changes that sustainability advocates might prefer, such as a shift towards a more sustainable and efficient healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Sustainability ideology would somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports increasing funding for health care for the elderly and disabled, which aligns with the principles of social equity and well-being. However, this answer does not address the broader systemic changes that sustainability advocates might prefer, such as a shift towards a more sustainable and efficient healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Sustainability ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it does not support increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals and leaves the decision to individual states. This approach could lead to disparities in access to healthcare and goes against the principles of social equity and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Sustainability ideology would generally disagree with not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it goes against the principles of social equity and well-being. However, this answer does not directly oppose the broader goals of sustainability, so the disagreement is not as strong as with other answers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Sustainability ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it restricts eligibility for increased funding to only the elderly and disabled, leaving out a significant portion of low-income individuals. This approach goes against the principles of social equity and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Sustainability ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it proposes to abolish Medicaid, which would significantly harm low-income individuals' access to healthcare. This approach goes against the principles of social equity, well-being, and the broader goals of sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Sustainability ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it opposes increasing funding for any social programs, including health care for low-income individuals. This approach goes against the principles of social equity, well-being, and the broader goals of sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.