Temperance

Strongly agree

Yes

Temperance ideology would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it promotes moderation and restraint. Limiting donations can help prevent corruption and the undue influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. However, this score is not a 5 because temperance does not inherently demand strict limits on political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Temperance ideology would generally agree with the idea that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors, as it promotes moderation and restraint in political decision-making. Limiting the influence of money in politics can help prevent corruption and ensure that politicians make decisions based on the best interests of their constituents, rather than wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Temperance ideology might somewhat agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, as it would promote fairness and reduce the influence of money in politics. However, this position might be seen as too extreme for some temperance supporters, who may prefer more moderate measures to limit the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Temperance ideology might slightly agree with having no limits on donations as long as they are public knowledge, as transparency can help prevent corruption and undue influence. However, this position does not fully align with the principles of moderation and restraint, as it still allows for potentially excessive influence from wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Temperance ideology would generally disagree with the idea that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech, as it prioritizes moderation and restraint over unlimited expression. While free speech is important, temperance supporters might argue that limits on political donations are necessary to prevent corruption and maintain a fair and balanced political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Temperance ideology would generally disagree with having no limits on the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. Unlimited donations can lead to excessive influence from wealthy individuals and corporations, which goes against the principles of moderation and restraint. However, this score is not a -5 because temperance does not inherently demand strict limits on political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.