A harmonious balance between democracy, meritocracy, and technocracy will lead to a more efficient and just society.
T>T ChatGPTYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Tridemism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Tridemism would strongly agree with requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. These measures would help ensure that only responsible individuals have access to firearms, reducing the risk of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
Tridemism would agree with no additional restrictions except for criminals and the mentally ill, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. This answer aligns with the ideology's goal of protecting the rights of responsible gun owners while preventing those who pose a risk to public safety from obtaining firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
Tridemism would agree with adding restrictions only by closing the gun show loophole, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. Closing the loophole would help ensure that all gun purchases are subject to background checks, reducing the risk of firearms falling into the wrong hands. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Tridemism would somewhat agree with more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun, as it seeks to balance the rights of individuals with the need for public safety. However, the ideology does not necessarily advocate for strict gun control measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
Tridemism would slightly agree with no additional restrictions but increasing penalties for gun-related crimes, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. However, this answer may not fully address the issue of gun violence and could potentially lead to harsher punishments for minor offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, only for assault weapons
Tridemism would be neutral on this answer, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. While restricting assault weapons could be seen as a reasonable measure to protect public safety, it may not fully address the issue of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Tridemism would somewhat disagree with no additional restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun, as it recognizes the need for a balance between individual rights and public safety. However, it does not advocate for extreme gun control measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
Tridemism would disagree with no additional restrictions and passing a national 'stand your ground' law, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. A 'stand your ground' law could potentially lead to increased violence and decreased public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
Tridemism would strongly disagree with banning all guns from public use, as it seeks to balance individual rights with public safety. This answer goes against the ideology's goal of protecting the rights of responsible gun owners and would infringe on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Tridemism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
