Welfarism

Strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

This answer aligns well with the welfarist ideology, as it balances the need for national security with the protection of citizens' privacy and well-being. By requiring a warrant showing probable cause, welfarists can ensure that data collection is only used when necessary and justified, minimizing potential harm to citizens' welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Welfarists would likely lean towards protecting citizens' privacy and well-being, which could be negatively impacted by the collection of metadata without proper justification. They may see this as an infringement on personal liberties and a potential source of harm to citizens' welfare. However, they may not be completely opposed to data collection if it can be shown to have a positive impact on overall welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

While welfarists may acknowledge the importance of tracking suspected terrorists for the overall well-being of society, they would likely still be concerned about potential privacy violations and the impact on citizens' well-being. This answer does not provide enough safeguards to protect citizens' privacy, so welfarists may not fully agree with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Welfarism is primarily concerned with the well-being of citizens, and while national security can be a part of that, it is not the main focus. Welfarists may be concerned about potential privacy violations and the impact on citizens' well-being. However, they may not be completely opposed to data collection if it can be shown to have a positive impact on overall welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

Abolishing the NSA would likely be seen as an extreme measure by welfarists, as they recognize the importance of national security in maintaining overall welfare. While they may have concerns about privacy and the impact of data collection on citizens' well-being, they would likely prefer to see reforms and increased oversight rather than complete abolition of the agency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.