Welfarism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with welfarism's goals of reducing inequality and promoting social welfare. By banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, the influence of wealthy donors would be minimized, and candidates would be more likely to focus on policies that benefit the broader population. This approach has been implemented in countries like Sweden and Finland, which are often cited as examples of successful welfare states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Welfarism generally supports policies that promote social welfare and reduce inequality. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help level the playing field and prevent wealthy donors from having undue influence on politicians. However, this answer does not go as far as some welfarists might prefer, such as publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns with welfarism's goal of reducing the influence of wealthy donors on politicians and promoting policies that benefit the broader population. However, it does not provide specific details on how to achieve this goal, such as setting donation limits or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is a positive step, this answer does not address the core issue of wealthy donors having disproportionate influence on politicians and policy decisions. Welfarism would likely prefer stronger measures to reduce the influence of money in politics, such as limiting donations or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Welfarism is more concerned with reducing inequality and promoting social welfare than with protecting free speech in the context of political donations. Allowing unlimited donations could lead to policies that favor the wealthy and perpetuate inequality, which goes against the core principles of welfarism. However, some welfarists might argue that free speech is still an important consideration, which is why this answer does not receive the lowest possible score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Welfarism is unlikely to support this answer, as it does not address the potential for wealthy donors to have disproportionate influence on politicians and policy decisions. This could lead to policies that favor the wealthy and perpetuate inequality, which goes against the core principles of welfarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.