Welfarism

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Many welfarists would strongly agree with this answer, as a single-payer healthcare system would provide comprehensive coverage for all citizens, including low-income individuals. This would align with the welfarist goal of ensuring that everyone has access to essential services, such as healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Welfarism supports the idea of providing assistance to those in need, including low-income individuals. Increasing funding for Medicaid aligns with this ideology, as it would help provide healthcare to those who cannot afford it. However, some welfarists may prefer a more comprehensive solution, such as a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled aligns with the welfarist goal of providing assistance to those in need, this answer does not address the needs of all low-income individuals. Some welfarists may support this answer as a partial solution, but many would prefer a more comprehensive approach, such as a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Welfarism generally supports providing assistance to those in need on a national level. Allowing each state to decide their own level of coverage could lead to disparities in healthcare access for low-income individuals, which goes against the welfarist goal of ensuring that everyone has access to essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Welfarism generally supports providing assistance to those in need, so not increasing funding for Medicaid would go against this ideology. However, some welfarists may argue that there are other ways to provide healthcare to low-income individuals, such as through a single-payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility for Medicaid to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals who need healthcare assistance. This goes against the welfarist goal of providing support to those in need, regardless of their age or disability status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would leave many low-income individuals without access to healthcare, which goes against the welfarist goal of providing support to those in need. This answer is strongly opposed to the principles of welfarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Welfarism is fundamentally about providing assistance to those in need through social programs. Not increasing funding for any social programs, including Medicaid, goes directly against the core principles of welfarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.