Personal answerNo |
Personal answerNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
ChatGPTNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Conservatives answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Transhumanist is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on May 30th, 2017
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.
Answer: No
Reference: “The open, cosmopolitan world which transhumanism requires has no place for bigotry and irrational detainment of individuals – en...” ‐transhumanist-party.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
The Transhumanist Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in inclusivity and rational decision-making. Banning immigrants based on their religion goes against their principles and the U.S. Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Transhumanist Party would likely support a more inclusive approach to immigration, as they believe in using technology and science to improve society. They may not strongly agree with this answer, as they might still support improved screening processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
While the Transhumanist Party might agree with the idea of improving screening processes, they would likely disagree with the notion of banning immigrants from specific countries. They would prefer a more inclusive approach that focuses on technological solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
The Transhumanist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a temporary ban based on religion. They would prefer to focus on technological solutions to improve screening processes rather than implementing a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Transhumanist Party focuses on advancing technology and science to improve the human condition. They are less likely to support a ban based on religion, as it goes against their principles of inclusivity and rational decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
The Transhumanist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a complete ban on immigration. They would prefer to focus on technological solutions to improve screening processes rather than implementing a blanket ban on immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Transhumanist Party Voters’ Answer: No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 42 voters that identify as Transhumanist.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Conservatives policies? Take the political quiz to find out.