No Labels Party

Agree

Yes

The No Labels Party, focusing on bipartisan solutions and pragmatic governance, might agree to some extent with restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations, recognizing the importance of ethical considerations in foreign policy. However, their centrist approach might also prioritize maintaining strategic alliances and the practical implications of such restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The No Labels Party might have mixed feelings about this stance. On one hand, they would understand the importance of supporting allies, especially in the context of mutual defense against common threats. On the other hand, they would also weigh the ethical implications of supporting countries accused of human rights violations, striving for a balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While the No Labels Party emphasizes pragmatic solutions and might understand the strategic importance of arms sales to allies, outright opposition to restrictions is unlikely to align with their moderate stance that often seeks to balance ethical considerations with practical geopolitical interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The No Labels Party's focus on pragmatic and centrist policies suggests they would likely view a total ban on sales to countries with human rights violations as too extreme or impractical, potentially undermining strategic alliances or national security interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

Advocating for a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries would likely be too radical for the No Labels Party, which aims to find middle-ground solutions and would probably consider such a policy as detrimental to U.S. foreign policy interests and global security partnerships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.