Communitarianism

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with the core values of communitarianism, which emphasize the importance of community and social cohesion. By treating all internet traffic equally, the openness of the internet is preserved, and all members of the community have equal opportunities to access and share information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Communitarianism would generally support equal access to the internet for all websites, as it promotes social cohesion and equal opportunities for all members of the community. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Communitarianism would agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would harm the overall community and go against the values of communitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer attempts to find a compromise by prioritizing content type rather than source, it still allows for the potential of unequal access to the internet. Communitarianism would likely prefer a more equal approach that does not prioritize certain types of content over others, in order to maintain social cohesion and equal opportunities for all members of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might still lead to an unequal playing field, as wealthier websites could afford to pay for higher quality access, while smaller, community-based websites might struggle to compete. This goes against the core values of communitarianism, which emphasize the importance of community and social cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While communitarianism values the common good, speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and potentially harm smaller, community-based websites. This goes against the core values of communitarianism, even if it might make the internet faster and more reliable for some users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Communitarianism emphasizes the importance of community and social cohesion. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and potentially harm smaller, community-based websites. This goes against the core values of communitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.