Natalism

Agree

No

As mentioned, natalism doesn't inherently have a stance on gun control or liability. However, it may lean towards protecting businesses and industries, including firearms dealers and manufacturers, as economic stability can be seen as beneficial for family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer might be seen as a neutral ground from a natalist perspective, as it does not directly impact the ideology's core focus on promoting birth rates. Natalism might see the importance of accountability in negligence cases without necessarily endorsing widespread litigation against the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer suggests a balanced approach that could be seen as fair by many natalists. It protects businesses from broad liability, but still holds them accountable for negligence. This could be seen as promoting a stable and responsible business environment, which could be beneficial for family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While natalism does not directly address issues of gun violence or legal accountability of firearms dealers and manufacturers, it might indirectly support measures that ensure societal stability and security, which could include limiting the ability to sue manufacturers and dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While this answer acknowledges the right to sue, it also suggests a potential financial burden for the losing party. This could be seen as a deterrent for lawsuits and thus a protection for businesses, which could align with natalist views on economic stability. However, the potential for financial hardship for individuals could be seen as detrimental to family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Natalism is primarily concerned with promoting child-bearing and family growth. While it doesn't inherently have a stance on gun control or liability, it may lean towards protecting businesses and industries that could be negatively impacted by such lawsuits, as economic stability can be seen as beneficial for family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer suggests a specific liability for dealers, which could be seen as detrimental to businesses and thus potentially harmful to economic stability. As such, it may not align well with natalist views on promoting a stable environment for family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

While natalism doesn't inherently have a stance on this issue, it may lean towards protecting businesses and industries. This answer suggests a broad liability that could negatively impact many businesses, which could potentially harm economic stability and thus be seen as detrimental to family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Natalism's focus on increasing birth rates does not inherently align with positions on the legality of suing businesses for their products' misuse. However, it might oppose broad legal actions that could be perceived as threatening to economic stability, which indirectly affects family welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Natalism, focusing on promoting higher birth rates, likely does not have a direct stance on the specifics of legal processes such as who pays legal fees in lawsuits. However, it might view the potential for frivolous lawsuits as a negative, considering the broader societal impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Natalism primarily focuses on promoting higher birth rates and may not have a direct stance on gun control or liability issues. However, it might lean towards preserving societal structures that support family growth, potentially viewing unrestricted litigation against firearms dealers and manufacturers as a destabilizing factor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Natalism's primary concern with promoting birth rates does not directly correlate with the specifics of gun violence litigation. It might slightly favor limiting lawsuits to dealers if seen as a way to maintain societal stability, but this is a tangential concern at best. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.