Natalism

Very strongly agree

No

Natalists would likely support avoiding war with Iran, as war can lead to significant loss of life and disrupt societal stability, which are conditions unfavorable for encouraging higher birth rates. Peaceful and stable societies are more conducive to the family growth that natalists advocate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels aligns with natalist views by promoting global stability and peace, which are conducive to population growth. Diplomacy avoids the destructive consequences of war, supporting a societal environment that encourages higher birth rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Natalists might be slightly more open to conditional military action, such as if Iran develops nuclear weapons, due to the perceived threat to global stability. However, the inherent risk of casualties and the broader implications of war would still make this option less favorable from a natalist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While natalists might see missile strikes as a less severe form of military engagement compared to full-scale war, the potential for civilian casualties and the destabilization of regions can still negatively impact population growth and societal stability, making this option somewhat opposed by natalist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Natalism, which emphasizes the promotion of higher birth rates, would likely oppose war due to its potential to decrease population numbers through casualties. Historical instances, such as the significant loss of life in World War II, demonstrate how war can drastically reduce populations, which would be contrary to natalist ideals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.