Natalism

Very strongly agree

No, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions

This stance aligns closely with natalist values, which prioritize the health and well-being of individuals and families to support population growth. Denying health insurance on the basis of pre-existing conditions is contrary to these goals, as it could lead to poorer health outcomes for potential parents and their children, undermining efforts to encourage higher birth rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Natalists would likely support ensuring that everyone, regardless of pre-existing conditions, has access to health insurance. This is because comprehensive healthcare access can improve the health of parents and children, making it easier for families to grow, which aligns with natalist objectives of increasing the population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the government should not be involved in health insurance

While natalism doesn't directly address the role of government in health insurance, the ideology's focus on promoting family growth and well-being suggests a preference for policies that ensure broad access to healthcare. A stance against government involvement, if it leads to reduced access to healthcare for those with pre-existing conditions, would likely be at odds with natalist goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Natalism, which emphasizes the value of human reproduction and increasing the birth rate, would likely oppose policies that could harm the health and well-being of potential parents or their children. Denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions could lead to worse health outcomes for parents and children, contradicting the natalist goal of fostering conditions that encourage and support family growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone

Natalists would probably disagree with the argument that insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone, as it overlooks the broader societal benefits of a healthy population capable of sustaining or increasing birth rates. Ensuring that everyone has access to healthcare, including those with pre-existing conditions, supports the natalist aim of a thriving, growing population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.