Natalism

Agree

No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Defining marriage strictly as between a man and a woman aligns with traditional natalist views that see such marriages as the ideal context for procreation and raising children. However, modern natalist movements might not universally adopt this stance, focusing instead on encouraging higher birth rates regardless of marital structure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Natalism is primarily concerned with promoting higher birth rates and does not inherently take a stance on the issue of same-sex marriage. However, since same-sex couples cannot naturally reproduce, some natalists may not support same-sex marriage, while others may support it in the context of adoption or surrogacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While natalism focuses on promoting higher birth rates, it does not necessarily oppose same-sex marriage outright. However, it prioritizes marriages that can biologically produce children, which might lead to a mild agreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

This position allows for legal recognition of same-sex relationships without equating them to marriage in the traditional sense, which might be somewhat aligned with natalist views that prioritize procreation within marriage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned, natalism does not inherently take a stance on same-sex marriage. Some natalists may oppose it due to the inability of same-sex couples to naturally reproduce, while others may not see it as a significant issue in relation to their primary goal of increasing birth rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

This stance is neutral from a natalist perspective. Natalism is primarily concerned with birth rates and does not inherently take a stance on the definition of marriage. Some natalists may support civil unions for same-sex couples, while others may not. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

While some natalists may agree with this statement due to the belief that heterosexual marriages are more likely to result in natural reproduction, others may not see the definition of marriage as relevant to their goal of increasing birth rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

This stance is neutral from a natalist perspective. Some natalists may support this view if they believe it would lead to higher birth rates, while others may not see it as relevant to their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

Natalism does not inherently take a stance on the role of government in marriage. Some natalists may support this view if they believe it would lead to higher birth rates, while others may not see it as relevant to their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

Taking the government out of marriage and making it a religious decision does not directly address natalist concerns about increasing birth rates. Natalism's stance on this issue would depend more on how individual religions view procreation and marriage rather than the legal structure itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

While this answer supports the legalization of same-sex marriage, it also acknowledges the right of religious institutions to refuse such ceremonies, which might slightly mitigate opposition from a natalist perspective. However, the primary focus on legalizing same-sex marriage would still be largely contrary to traditional natalist priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Natalism emphasizes the importance of increasing birth rates and often aligns with traditional family structures, which typically include marriage between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation. Legalizing same-sex marriage might be viewed as not directly contributing to this primary goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.