Socialist Feminism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Socialist feminists would strongly agree with this answer, as they are concerned with promoting equality and preventing the concentration of power and resources in the hands of a few. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would be antithetical to the principles of socialist feminism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all internet traffic equally aligns with the socialist feminist commitment to equality and fairness. By advocating for the continued openness of the internet, socialist feminists would be supporting a more inclusive and diverse online environment, which is consistent with their broader goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Socialist feminists would likely support equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This stance aligns with their broader commitment to social and economic equality, as well as their opposition to policies that disproportionately benefit the wealthy or powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing internet traffic by type rather than source might seem like a more equitable approach, socialist feminists would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to exploit this system to the detriment of smaller websites and content creators. As such, they would likely be hesitant to support this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might still disproportionately benefit wealthier websites and content creators, which would be contrary to the principles of socialist feminism. Additionally, determining what constitutes 'quality' could be subjective and potentially biased, further exacerbating inequalities in access to the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access might be seen as a positive outcome, socialist feminists would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to a less diverse and inclusive internet, which would be contrary to the goals of socialist feminism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Socialist feminism generally opposes policies that create or exacerbate inequalities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would likely disadvantage smaller websites and content creators, which goes against the principles of equality and fairness that socialist feminists advocate for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.